Home | e-Alert Archives | ProductsBecome a Premium Member | Forum | Members Archive | Site MapJuly 4, 2008



  Log-in
  Member Alert
   Archives

  Ask the Experts
  Community 
   Forum


  Welcome to HSI
  Our Mission
  HSI Research 
   Experts
  Success Stories
  Contact Us



  Northstar 
   Nutritionals
  Healthy 
   Solutions
  Recommended 
   Books

 Privacy Policy
 FAQ
 Guarantee
 Disclaimer

start WP import block

Northern Exposure

If you think our jails are overcrowded now, just wait until the
federal government tries to put the state of New Hampshire and the City of Boston in jail. That's going to be some serious overcrowding.

Doin' time 

"Live free or die" is the bold state motto of New Hampshire. And in that spirit, NH Governor Craig Benson announced last week that his state will defy federal law and purchase prescription drugs from Canada for Medicaid recipients and prison inmates. The estimated savings would probably top $1.5 million.

On the same day, Boston's Mayor Thomas M. Menino told reporters that beginning next summer his city will buy Canadian drugs for city employees, creating a projected savings of $1 million per year.

And you can be sure that the FDA isn't one bit happy about all this. But what are they going to do? Put Boston in jail? Beyond issuing a stern warning, it will be interesting to see how far the FDA attempts to go here. Especially when you consider that the FDA can't even touch the biggest U.S. customer for Canadian drugs.

And you might be flabbergasted to find out who that customer is.

I know I was. 

 $afety fir$t

Suddenly we have a real revolution in the works.

The New Hampshire and Boston announcements were made only one day after President Bush signed the new Medicare bill into law.  At one point the bill contained provisions that would allow U.S. Medicare patients to purchase less expensive Canadian drugs, or
U.S. drugs re-imported from Canada at rates much lower than they could find anywhere here at home. But somewhere along the line those provisions were quietly removed from the bill.

Now let's put our heads together and see if we can figure out just who might have influenced various congressmen to remove those boarder-hopping provisions that would have saved U.S. consumers millions of dollars. Do you think lobbyists for drug companies might have had something to do with it? And do you think it might snow in Canada this winter?

Meanwhile, FDA officials continue to maintain that the economics of the situation are of no concern to them. They say it's a SAFETY issue, implying that Canadian safety standards are not set at the same superior level as those of the FDA. But so far their warnings about safety concerns have done nothing to slow down the sales of Canadian drugs and re-imported U.S. drugs to U.S. citizens. According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, we bought more than $1 billion worth of drugs from Canada last year.

The jaw dropper

And here's where it gets REALLY interesting.

According to a CBS evening news "Inside Story" report last week, Boston and New Hampshire and all the buying power of individual U.S. citizens are very small potatoes compared to the largest U.S. customer of Canadian pharmaceuticals: The U.S. government.

If your jaw hit the floor when you read that, then you look
exactly the way I looked when I saw the CBS report. I thought
I'd heard it all, but this not only takes the cake, it takes the
whole buffet.

The Department of Defense and the Veterans' Administration are just two government agencies that are allowed a special waiver to purchase drugs from Canada or any other country; something that citizens like you and me can't do. Not to mention Boston and New Hampshire.

In the CBS report, Michael Valentino - a spokesman for the
Department of Veterans' Affairs - was asked to estimate how much his department has spent on foreign drugs. He said, "It's been in the hundreds of millions of dollars over the last several years."

Goose, meet gander

So in spite of the supposed "safety concerns" the FDA says are presented by these foreign drugs, millions of veterans and others through the Defense Department have been supplied with Canadian drugs for years.

Of course, what we're witnessing in all of this is some of the
most cynical cronyism you can imagine. Congressmen, regulators, and lobbyists accommodate one another as they please, but when it comes to the needs of citizens, or cities and states struggling in the current economic climate, we're given restrictions and left to our own devices.

A couple of centuries ago a certain tea party in Boston helped trigger a revolution.

Keep your eyes open for a harbor full of Lipitor, Vioxx and
Viagra.

To Your Good Health and…  Go Ravens!

Jenny Thompson
Health Sciences Institute


Sources: 

"Boston to Break Law and Buy Canadian Drugs" CBC News, 12/9/03, cbc.ca

"Boldly Crossing the Line for Cheaper Drugs" Pam Belluck, The New York Times, 12/10/03, nytimes.com

"Boston, New Hampshire to Begin Buying Cheaper Drugs from Canada" PBS, 12/10/03, pbs.org

"Cross-Border Rx" Justin Thompson, CBC News Online, 11/7/03, cbc.ca "Inside Story" Cynthia Bowers, CBS News, 12/9/03



  

end WP import block

Sign-up to receive the free
HSI e-Alert daily e-letter.

Privacy policy




HSI Only Special Reports

 >> Defeat Heart Disease 

 >> Ultimate HRT Alternative
 >> Weight loss solutions
 >> Drive out toxins
 >> Covering up your skin?
 >> Boost your immunity

 >> Prevent prostate problems

 >> Multiple Sclerosis relief
 >> Goodbye to arthritis
 >> Dangerous parasites

 >> Fight fatigue

Get more alternative medicine breakthroughs in the Member Alert.


back to top

Health Disclaimer!  The information provided on this site should not be construed as personal medical advice or instruction. No action should be taken based solely on the contents of this site. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health and well-being. The information and opinions provided here are believed to be accurate and sound, based on the best judgment available to the authors, but readers who fail to consult appropriate health authorities assume the risk of any injuries. The publisher is not responsible for errors or omissions.



Copyright © 1997 - 2007 by Institute of Health Sciences, L.L.C.