Home | e-Alert Archives | ProductsBecome a Premium Member | Forum | Members Archive | Site MapMay 11, 2008



  Log-in
  Member Alert
   Archives

  Ask the Experts
  Community 
   Forum


  Welcome to HSI
  Our Mission
  HSI Research 
   Experts
  Success Stories
  Contact Us



  Northstar 
   Nutritionals
  Healthy 
   Solutions
  Recommended 
   Books

 Privacy Policy
 FAQ
 Guarantee
 Disclaimer

start WP import block

The Supplement Report

If you want to present a TV "news" report on dietary supplements, here are three points you MUST remember to include:

1) Supplements might hurt you
2) Supplements could be a waste of money
3) The U.S. government doesn't regulate supplements

Last week, the local ABC affiliate here in Baltimore presented a report on the ConsumerLab multivitamin analysis I told you about in the e-Alert "No Hazmats!" (1/30/07).

That analysis was useful, but only to a point. The ConsumerLab scientists tested several brands of multis for purity, dissolvability, and content, but missed entirely on other quality measures - such as the fact that the Flintstones Complete brand (which scored high marks) contains trans fatty acids.

So when the local reporters presented their take on the ConsumerLab analysis, they made sure to hit the hot buttons, leading off with this question: "Could these vital vitamins be a waste of money, or, worse yet, could they actually hurt you?"

This was followed a moment later with the claim that supplements are not regulated by the federal government. That's 100 percent inaccurate, of course - the government DOES regulate supplements. But for some reason, most reporters can't grasp the simple fact that drugs and supplements are quite different and are regulated differently, as they should be.

To cap off this general misinformation about an incomplete lab analysis, the local reporter also stated that multivitamins are "meant to take the place of the fruits and vegetables we don't always eat in our busy lives."

Wrong again on two counts. Supplements don't take the place of nutritious food; they "supplement" the diet with additional nutrients. The difference is subtle, but it's important. No pill will ever take the place of fresh fruits and vegetables.

And it's entirely off the mark to blame bad choices on being busy. If someone chooses French fries instead of carrot sticks, it's not because they're busy, it's because they would rather indulge in some nice, warm, salty, crispy, buttery-tasting fries.

I'm looking forward to the day when a TV report - whether national or local - gets these points right. Until then, I'm afraid we can expect to see much more of this fill-in-the-blanks style of reporting.

end WP import block

Sign-up to receive the free
HSI e-Alert daily e-letter.

Privacy policy




HSI Only Special Reports

 >> Defeat Heart Disease 

 >> Ultimate HRT Alternative
 >> Weight loss solutions
 >> Drive out toxins
 >> Covering up your skin?
 >> Boost your immunity

 >> Prevent prostate problems

 >> Multiple Sclerosis relief
 >> Goodbye to arthritis
 >> Dangerous parasites

 >> Fight fatigue

Get more alternative medicine breakthroughs in the Member Alert.


back to top

Health Disclaimer!  The information provided on this site should not be construed as personal medical advice or instruction. No action should be taken based solely on the contents of this site. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health and well-being. The information and opinions provided here are believed to be accurate and sound, based on the best judgment available to the authors, but readers who fail to consult appropriate health authorities assume the risk of any injuries. The publisher is not responsible for errors or omissions.



Copyright © 1997 - 2007 by Institute of Health Sciences, L.L.C.